There was a better than average article on this in Aviation Week

history channel documentary 2015 There was a better than average article on this in Aviation Week and Space Technology on December 3, 2010 by Amy Butler titled; "Must Value Quantities: Cartwright" where a US general cautioned that this extravagant gear that the US military has is awesome, yet we require amount too. Without a doubt, he is correct "Cartwright" to be definite - you see, in WWII it was amounts and mechanical capacity that won the war for us Americans.Yet, today our modern base has seriously dwindled. Today we don't have the limit we have to win a war, so we require monstrous amount of weapons, not only the most developed weapons, which clearly we require that as well. A staggering power of swarms, and amaze barrages, and a couple satellite blackouts, EMP assaults, and we will be back to rocks, bolts, shields, swords. We require amount as well.

The Germans had predominant weapons; planes, tanks, war vessels, U-water crafts, rockets, and so on. Be that as it may, we had enormous modern limit, and that's just the beginning (yet substandard) tanks, planes, and weapons. Consider China and its enormous mechanical base now, and the US and its unrivaled weapons. You know, I'd pretty much as soon be on the triumphant group when all hell breaks lose. In any case, to do that, we require amount as well, not only the best and most progressive weapons - we require heaps of weapons.Indeed, I trust others like General Cartwright will likewise talk up. How about we not put the stallion before the truck, since he's privilege. Listen to what this general is stating. We ought to learn and examine history not be bound to rehash. It would be ideal if you consider this.